HRM 610 HRM/610 HRM610 WEEK 1 DISCUSSION 2 (ASHFORD)

HRM 610 HRM/610 HRM610 WEEK 1 DISCUSSION 2 (ASHFORD) 



BUY HERE

Ashford HRM 610 Week 1 Discussion 2 Discrimination in the Workplace [WLOs: 1, 2, 3]
Discrimination in the Workplace [WLOs: 1, 2, 3] [CLOs: 1, 2]. 1st Post Due by Day 3. A local Italian restaurant chain is interviewing and hiring in-house for a regional district restaurant manager. Ryan, a 49-year-old male, applied for this promotion. Along with him, three other employees applied for the promotion: Pam, Rick, and Chris. Pam, a 40-year-old female, was promoted and not Ryan. Of course, Ryan believes that he was equally qualified for the promotion, should have received the promotion, and therefore felt he was discriminated against. Based on this scenario, address the following in your initial post:
 What current laws apply to the case study and why?
 What does Ryan need provide for a discrimination case? What evidence does Ryan need to prove discrimination occurred?
• What are the steps Ryan should take, if any, for a discrimination case?










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

PSY 325 PSY/325 PSY325 FINAL EXAM ANSWERS (ASHFORD) 2020

BUS 623 BUS/623 BUS623 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION 1 (ASHFORD)

BUS 621 BUS/621 BUS621 WEEK 5 DISCUSSION 1 (ASHFORD)